Posts

New Article on LinkedIn: The Victorian Mathematician Who Predicted Your Smartphone

Image
New Article on LinkedIn: The Victorian Mathematician Who Predicted Your Smartphone What if the mathematical principles powering your iPhone were invented 200 years ago? In 1991, engineers at London's Science Museum held their breath as they turned the brass crank of a magnificent 5-ton machine. Gears clicked, wheels turned, and suddenly—mathematical perfection. The machine calculated complex tables with flawless precision, proving that designs from 150 years earlier were not only correct, but revolutionary. The mind behind those "impossible" plans? Charles Babbage - a frustrated mathematician whose logical approach to problem-solving became the blueprint for our entire digital world. The Method That Changed Everything At the heart of Babbage's breakthrough was an elegant mathematical concept called the Method of Differences . This wasn't just clever engineering—it was pure mathematical genius that transformed complex multiplication into simple addition, eliminati...

Solve: Optimizing Aurora PostgreSQL with PgPool-II – A Recipe for Robust Connection Management and Load Balancing

Image
Solve: Optimizing Aurora PostgreSQL with PgPool-II – A Recipe for Robust Connection Management and Load Balancing Problem Your Aurora PostgreSQL database is exhibiting performance bottlenecks, including high connection counts, uneven load across read replicas, or a struggle to efficiently manage read and write operations. Your applications might be experiencing latency or instability, indicating a need for a more robust middleware solution. Clarifying the Issue Database performance issues often arise from how applications interact with the database, particularly concerning the volume and management of connections and the distribution of queries. Without a dedicated proxy, applications might overwhelm the primary instance with read traffic, fail to utilize read replicas effectively, or incur significant overhead from repeatedly opening and closing connections. This is a common challenge for established applications or those with complex query patterns. Why It ...

Solve: Unlocking High Performance Aurora PostgreSQL with PgCat – A Recipe for Modern Connection Management

Image
Solve: Unlocking High Performance Aurora PostgreSQL with PgCat – A Recipe for Modern Connection Management Problem Your application is struggling with database performance, experiencing slow response times, connection errors, or high CPU utilization on your Aurora PostgreSQL cluster. You suspect the way your application interacts with the database, particularly concerning connection management and query routing, is a significant bottleneck. Clarifying the Issue The core problem often stems from inefficient database connection handling and an inability to effectively leverage Aurora PostgreSQL's distributed architecture (like read replicas). Each new database connection incurs overhead, and if your application frequently opens and closes connections, or sends all traffic to the primary instance, your database can become overwhelmed. This is especially true for modern, cloud-native applications, serverless functions, or microservices that might create a lar...

Insight: Navigating PostgreSQL in AWS Aurora—Why Your Reads Aren't Scaling and How to Fix It

Image
Insight: Navigating PostgreSQL in AWS Aurora—Why Your Reads Aren't Scaling and How to Fix It Introduction Ever scratch your head wondering why your perfectly scaled Aurora PostgreSQL cluster still seems to have a bottleneck on the primary database, even with all those shiny read replicas? You're not alone. The challenge of effectively routing database queries in a highly distributed, cloud-native environment like AWS Aurora is a common pain point. It's not just about having more database instances; it's about making sure your applications use them correctly. Routing Issues As Performance Bottlenecks You've got a fantastic AWS Aurora PostgreSQL database, designed for scalability and high availability. You've added read replicas, expecting your read-heavy application to distribute its load across them. But then you see it: the primary instance (the "writer") is still taking the brunt of the traffic, even for simple SELECT statements, while your read repl...

Insight: From Chaos to Control Plane—Is EKS Really That Much Easier Than On-Prem Kubernetes?

Image
Insight: From Chaos to Control Plane—Is EKS Really That Much Easier Than On-Prem Kubernetes? When I came across a post from an SRE managing an on-prem Kubernetes cluster on RHEL, it struck a chord. Every day brought a new issue: master nodes dropping off, worker nodes becoming unreachable, and endless layers of network and VM complexity to peel back. Anyone who’s operated Kubernetes on bare metal or traditional virtualization knows the drill — it’s a daily dance with entropy, and your only partner is kubectl and hope. This is the reality for many engineers who still manage clusters in datacenters or hybrid clouds. You patch VMs, babysit control planes, troubleshoot disk I/O issues, and triage hardware blips — all while keeping containerized workloads running smoothly. It's the ultimate full-stack challenge: networking, storage, CPU scheduling, and orchestration all wrapped into one. If you love complexity, it’s a paradise. If you’re trying to ship features? It's a drag. The EK...

Insight: Why Aurora’s Reader Endpoint Isn’t Enough—The Real Problem with Query Routing

Image
Insight: Why Aurora’s Reader Endpoint Isn’t Enough—The Real Problem with Query Routing The Mirage of Simplicity Aurora PostgreSQL makes a beautiful promise: scale reads with a simple reader endpoint and keep your writer node clean. You spin up replicas, wire your app to the provided DNS name, and expect the load to distribute itself. It feels seamless — until you realize your writer instance is still carrying the weight of most SELECT queries. Something’s not right. The infra looks healthy. The DNS is resolving. But the query traffic is misbehaving. That’s because Aurora’s built-in reader endpoint is not a traffic controller — it’s a DNS trick. It doesn’t understand query intent. It doesn’t monitor replica lag. It doesn’t know your business logic or your application’s needs. It just points your app in a general direction and hopes for the best. And that illusion of simplicity is where many teams run aground. The Problem Beneath the Problem This isn’t just about DNS. It’s about visibili...

Solve: How to Modularize Your SAM Templates Without Breaking sam sync

Image
Solve: How to Modularize Your SAM Templates Without Breaking sam sync The Tension Between Modularity and Speed The AWS SAM CLI has grown into a powerful developer toolset, and  sam sync  is one of its most welcome additions. It lets you update your deployed application fast, skipping a full CloudFormation round trip and keeping your edit-deploy-test loop tight. But there's a catch:  sam sync  expects a flat, ready-to-go  template.yaml . That can make modularization difficult. If you're breaking your SAM template into smaller files for clarity and reuse, you risk breaking compatibility with  sam sync —unless you finish the thought. What sam sync Expects From You Under the hood,  sam sync  is watching a specific file:  template.yaml . It assumes that file defines the whole application—no includes, no file stitching, just a single YAML document describing all resources and configuration. If your team splits...