Insight: When "latest" Breaks Your Lambda—A Case Study

Insight: When "latest" Breaks Your Lambda—A Case Study

It wasn’t your code. It wasn’t your CI pipeline. And yet, sometime last week, your previously stable Go-based AWS Lambda function started failing on cold starts. The logs weren’t vague about it either: 

Bash

GLIBCXX_3.4.30 not found   

Cue the flashbacks. You scramble for diffs, check Git history, deploy rollbacks—and still, the error persists. Then the realization hits: it’s not your code that changed. It’s the Docker base image.

The Silent Assassin: latest

The root cause was subtle but not rare: your Dockerfile used arm64v8/amazonlinux:latest as the build image. This tag updated silently in the background and brought along a newer version of libstdc++ with it. Your Go binary, likely relying on a transitive C++ dependency, was now compiled against GLIBCXX_3.4.30. Problem is, AWS Lambda’s runtime environment didn’t have that symbol available. Cold start = runtime crash.

The fix? Pin the build container to a specific tag—arm64v8/amazonlinux:2023.6.20250317.2. That stopped the bleeding. But that’s not the end of the story.

This kind of issue hits deep for engineers who build and deploy on serverless. It’s not just a technical glitch—it’s a breach of trust between build-time assumptions and runtime guarantees. And it’s something you can design around.

What You Can Do (Next Time, or Right Now)

1. Pin everything in CI. Never use latest in a build pipeline, especially not for base images. Every build should be deterministic. When you update a base image, it should be a conscious decision and a tested change.

2. Check binary symbols. If you're unsure about what your Go binary depends on, inspect it with ldd or strings to catch any dynamic library surprises. Look for telltale signs like GLIBCXX versions that your runtime doesn’t support.

3. Compare Docker image changes. Tools like dive can help visualize layer-level diffs. You can also export both containers to disk, run find / -type f | sort, and diff the output. Crude, but sometimes the best insight comes from manual digging.

4. Consider static builds. If you don’t need dynamic linking, a fully statically linked Go binary is a clean escape hatch. Look into musl-based builds or toolchains like xgo if you want to fully own your dependencies.

5. Match your build and runtime. AWS provides base images for Lambda—consider building inside the same image you’ll deploy to. This gives you a much tighter guarantee of compatibility.

Lessons from the War Room

This wasn’t a catastrophe, but it’s the kind of thing that eats a day, breaks trust, and makes engineers second-guess a clean deploy. The scary part? It looked like a Go problem, or maybe a Lambda quirk—but it was neither. It was a supply chain issue, buried in your Docker base image tag.

No alarms. No breaking news. Just a quiet, breaking change.

We like to think of serverless as a black box with clear contracts—but when you bring your own build image, you’re now negotiating across two evolving systems: yours and AWS’s. The only real safety net? Reproducibility.

This wasn’t whining. This was a war room. And the outcome? Build smarter, deploy safer, pin everything.

Need AWS Expertise?

We'd love to help you with your AWS projects.  Feel free to reach out to us at info@pacificw.com.

Image: Gemini