Solve: Diagnosing Aurora PostgreSQL Query Routing Issues
Solve: Diagnosing Aurora PostgreSQL Query Routing Issues
I. The Quiet Cost of Misrouted Queries
When your Aurora PostgreSQL cluster starts slowing down, the first thing many engineers think about is scaling. Maybe your app grew. Maybe you need a bigger instance. But sometimes, the issue isn't size—it's traffic routing.
Aurora is designed for performance, but only if you use its features the way AWS intended. One of the most important—but often overlooked—tools in your belt is the reader endpoint. Aurora clusters come with both a writer endpoint and a read-only endpoint, and each serves a different role:
If your application sends everything to the writer—reads and writes—you’re unintentionally turning your write-optimized instance into a bottleneck. You’re stacking up SELECTs where they don’t belong, and in return you get:
Many teams don’t realize this is happening. They’ve inherited infrastructure. They’re using a single database connection string. Or their ORM doesn’t split read/write traffic. That’s not a failure of knowledge—it’s a failure of visibility.
So let’s fix that.
When your Aurora PostgreSQL cluster starts slowing down, the first thing many engineers think about is scaling. Maybe your app grew. Maybe you need a bigger instance. But sometimes, the issue isn't size—it's traffic routing.
Aurora is designed for performance, but only if you use its features the way AWS intended. One of the most important—but often overlooked—tools in your belt is the reader endpoint. Aurora clusters come with both a writer endpoint and a read-only endpoint, and each serves a different role:
- The writer handles all data changes—INSERTs, UPDATEs, DELETEs, etc.
- The readers are for SELECTs—reporting dashboards, analytics, background jobs, and any operation that doesn't change data.
If your application sends everything to the writer—reads and writes—you’re unintentionally turning your write-optimized instance into a bottleneck. You’re stacking up SELECTs where they don’t belong, and in return you get:
- Higher CPU and memory use on the writer
- Slower transaction times
- More risk during failover or peak load
Many teams don’t realize this is happening. They’ve inherited infrastructure. They’re using a single database connection string. Or their ORM doesn’t split read/write traffic. That’s not a failure of knowledge—it’s a failure of visibility.
So let’s fix that.
II. A Tool to Show You What’s Really Happening
Instead of guessing, you need a quick way to confirm:
- Are SELECT queries going to the writer instance?
- How many are running right now?
- What apps or users are sending them?
This post introduces a diagnostic tool—command-line based, menu-driven, and beginner-friendly—that shows you exactly where your traffic is going. You don’t need to install anything complicated. Just connect to your Aurora cluster and get a clean report in under 10 seconds.
Here’s what the user menu looks like:
III. How Do We Fix It?
Once the diagnostic report confirms that SELECT queries are hitting your writer instance, it’s time to fix the routing. Aurora gives you the tools—you just have to apply them correctly.
There are three common ways to separate read and write traffic in Aurora PostgreSQL. You only need to choose one that fits how your application is set up today.
1. Point SELECT Traffic to the Reader Endpoint
Aurora clusters expose a dedicated read-only endpoint that automatically load-balances across all available replicas. You can fetch it like this:
2. Use RDS Proxy with Read-Only Database Users
Amazon RDS Proxy doesn’t automatically inspect queries, but it can route connections based on the database user. That means you can create a user that only runs SELECTs, connect it through the proxy, and keep write traffic separate.
Step 1: Create a read-only user inside the database
If your app doesn’t natively support read/write splitting, you can run PgBouncer locally or on a sidecar container to do it for you. PgBouncer doesn’t inspect queries by default, but it can run separate instances or connection pools for each role.
Sample config for read pool (``):
Each of these fixes is simple once you see it, but hidden if you don’t know where to look. That’s what our diagnostic tool is for: to help you see clearly and take action with confidence.
IV. Summary: A Checklist for Fixing Aurora Query Routing
Now that you’ve seen the report and understand the cause, here’s a quick summary you can use with your team to plan the fix. Copy it, paste it into Slack or Notion, and go from red to green in one short session.
Aurora Query Routing Checklist
- Run the diagnostic script and check if SELECTs are hitting the writer
- Identify the services or users responsible for the SELECT traffic
- Choose one of the following solutions:
- Use Aurora’s read-only endpoint for SELECTs
- Create a read-only DB user and route through RDS Proxy
- Configure PgBouncer to split read/write traffic
- Test routing with pg_is_in_recovery() to verify which instance is receiving the traffic
- Monitor replica lag (CloudWatch → AuroraReplicaLag) before moving latency-sensitive queries
Even if you’re still learning, this is a great first project to take ownership of. The difference it makes in real-world performance is immediate—and measurable.
Download the Aurora Query Routing Checker
You can grab the full Python script from our GitHub Gist. Just click the link below, copy the contents into a local file, and run it from your Python virtual environment:
👉 Download the script — aurora_query_check.py
Closing: Help Your Database Help You
You don’t need to be a senior engineer to solve a real production problem. What you need is visibility. This diagnostic tool doesn’t just help you debug—it helps you grow.
By letting Aurora’s writer do what it does best—handle changes—and letting the readers carry the SELECT load, you reduce risk, lower costs, and keep your services healthy under pressure.
If you have questions, suggestions, or real-world results, feel free to reach out—we're here to help, and this post was made with teams like yours in mind.
* * *
Written by Aaron Rose, software engineer and technology writer at Tech-Reader.blog.
Comments
Post a Comment