The Night We Admitted AI Writes Better Code
We weren’t coders anymore
It was 11:47 p.m. in the break room — the kind of hour when fluorescent lights buzz just loud enough to feel personal.
Dylan was stirring his fourth cup of coffee. I was poking at a stale vending-machine sandwich that looked older than our last code freeze. We were two senior devs, ten-plus years in the trenches, supposed to be debugging an API issue in production.
But we both knew we were circling something bigger.
“You ever notice,” Dylan said, “that the AI’s pull requests never argue back?”
I laughed. “That’s because it doesn’t have pride. It just rewrites.”
He nodded, staring into the cup like he was trying to read logs in the coffee. “It’s cleaner, man. Every time I ask it to fix my Python functions, it comes back better than what I’d have written fresh. No missing imports. Perfect formatting. It’s elegant.”
The silence that followed wasn’t awkward — it was realization.
The kind that settles in when two old craftsmen realize the factory runs just fine without them.
The Quiet Confession
I said what we were both thinking.
“It’s better than us now.”
He exhaled. “Yeah. And that’s what’s killing me. I used to be proud of the way I named variables. The way I’d structure a function — little things that felt like handwriting. Now it’s just... generic perfection.”
He wasn’t wrong.
AI doesn’t get clever or sentimental. It doesn’t sneak in jokes or cryptic abbreviations. It writes exactly what you ask for — nothing more, nothing less.
No half-finished TODOs. No Friday-afternoon shortcuts. Just clarity.
And the thing that really gets me? It learns.
Show it one refactor, and it applies the pattern globally, instantly.
No memory leaks. No fatigue. No ego.
Dylan gave a hollow laugh. “We’re debugging code we didn’t even write anymore.”
What We Still Have
We sat there a while, the hum of the server room bleeding through the walls.
“I guess what’s left for us,” I said, “is to be the ones who know what to ask for.”
That perked him up a little. “Yeah. The prompt people. The human context.”
“Exactly. It doesn’t know why we’re building the feature. It doesn’t know that marketing wants it live by Thursday, or that legal changed the API terms again. It just writes.”
Dylan leaned back. “So we become directors instead of typists.”
There it was — the shift.
Right there over cold coffee and a half-eaten sandwich.
We weren’t losing our craft. We were moving up the stack.
The best developers of this decade wouldn’t be the fastest typists.
They’d be the ones who describe the cleanest intent.
I told him, “The real code now is the prompt. Every word we give it is a design decision.”
He smirked. “So the new job description is: fluent in Python, fluent in English.”
We both laughed — the weary, relieved kind of laugh you let out when something finally clicks.
The Turning Point
Around 1 a.m., the AI assistant running in our CI pipeline finally flagged the bug — a missing exception handler buried six layers deep in a utility function.
It fixed the code before either of us could move our fingers.
Dylan stared at the screen. “It’s like working with a ghost who’s never wrong.”
“Yeah,” I said. “But it still needs us to tell it what matters.”
Because that’s the part it’ll never get — the why.
The business context, the trade-offs, the human reasoning behind the architecture.
AI can refactor a module in milliseconds.
But it doesn’t know if that refactor makes sense for the roadmap.
It doesn’t know if it breaks customer trust, or makes onboarding easier for the next hire.
That’s our lane now — purpose, not syntax.
The Moral of the Night
We finally closed our laptops around 1 a.m. The bug was fixed, the CI pipeline was green, and the coffee had gone cold.
On the way out, Dylan said, “You know what? It’s not that AI writes better code. It’s that it follows better instructions.”
“Yeah,” I said. “And we’re the ones who have to give them.”
That was the moment it sank in — the age of writing code was ending, but something better was beginning.
We weren’t coders anymore.
We were architects of intent.
The keyboard had become a conductor’s baton. The orchestra was silicon.
And as we stepped into the quiet parking lot, I realized:
AI wasn’t replacing us. It was forcing us to become what we were supposed to be all along — people who think before they type.
And honestly? That felt like progress.
Aaron Rose is a software engineer and technology writer at tech-reader.blog and the author of Think Like a Genius.
Comments
Post a Comment